About Me

Category: Uncategorized (Page 1 of 3)

Everywhere should have a book about it as good as this one

At this point in the pandemic it may feel fantastical, but imagine yourself preparing for a long, lovely vacation in a country very foreign to you. Wouldn’t it be wondrous to read a book about the place, written by a critical outsider, who also had thorough experience and love for this location? I was fortunate to experience this with Indonesia, Etc., by Elizabeth Pisani. Every inch of earth deserves a book written with the care and integrity Pisani brings, and it would make the earth a better, more appreciated place. I would love a database that showed the corresponding book for every place on earth.

Indonesia is a massive country: fourth most populous, and around 14th in area (there is a lot of water). Further, it is extremely diverse in language, religion, ethnicity, and climate. Pisani conveys the complex balance of Indonesia, summarized in one of their pillars of the nation, and national motto, “Unity in Diversity”. Americans could take heed. In the book, Pisani travels in a massive oval around the country she has inhabited for over two decades, sharing insights, stories, history, and more in a glorious ramble. My wife lived in Indonesia for four years, and they both frequently mentioned the same charming idiosyncrasies: food trucks that make similar repetitive noise for the same foods, thronging pulses of crowds, the ubiquity of delicious Padang food, and a general contentment among the people. There is a reason you can readily go to many different Asian restaurants, but likely have difficulty finding an Indonesian one- life is so pleasant, few want to leave.

Not to say the country doesn’t have issues, and the populace endures difficult circumstances meriting thoughtful assistance. But the book is worth reading, and the country is worth visiting. One major recommendation from both my family and the book is to include a visit to an island other than Java, Sumatra, and Bali, if you are able.

What defunding the police means, and how it relates to meditation

In my home state, there is a fascinating gubernatorial primary race featuring the former Chief of Police in Detroit, James Craig. When he was in that role, he struck me as an acceptable policeman, and in conversations with black folks in Detroit, most felt safe from police officers in our city. Now, he is running for governor, on a highly Republican platform, and in Joe Biden’s State of the Union address, he revived discussion over the phrase Defund the Police, to bipartisan applause.

What I find missing from conversations regarding defunding the police is what it actually entails and looks like in areas where crime is visible. I live in a city known as having high rates of crime, though I have found it quite safe, and we live in an era of relatively low crime. But, here, as elsewhere, people routinely break laws, and sometimes it leads to community consternation. And after George Floyd was murdered, many healthy conversations about whether to “defund the police” were had. I felt blessed to engage in these conversations having had meditated, and practiced suspending my judgement and thought.

I will never forget the morning my wife and I discussed the “Defund the Police” argument over breakfast, and I stupidly asked, “What, are you going to just let people speed down the road and not pull them over?”, to the gentle din of cars speeding down one of our cities main throughfares, past a police station. After this rhetorical blunder, I realized that we have cast so many of our collective social problems as issues which can be fixed by police, traffic being one.

My neighborhood had suffered from speeders careening down streets at shocking rates, leading to many residents losing vehicles to hit and runs, and one neighbor being struck by a car. For years, we requested the city install speed humps, but city officials routinely misled residents claiming they could damage snow plows and impede emergency vehicles. Often, in the summer months, they would “increase patrols” to address racing. In our neighborhood, this led to absolutely no change in observed behavior. Finally, after many resident complaints and requests, the city began installing speed humps, and this program has become one of the most popular programs in the city. We have them on our street, and they have definitely and thankfully reduced speeding in our neighborhood. And they require exactly zero police officers to maintain. The problem of speeding, which had been cast in the light of a criminal problem to be solved by police, has actually been fixed by the public works department.

We deal with another problem which would benefit from a re-examination outside of the context of policing. Near my neighborhood, prostitution is common, and very unfortunate. Several times I have seen women in extremely dire circumstances, dressed to various levels, clearly influenced by drugs and trauma. I view this situation as one of public safety, and would love to have my municipal government help keep those involved safe and offer a pathway out of this situation. But the only publicly funded phone number I have to call is the police, and I do not view the women involved as engaged in criminal behavior. So a reform of the notion of public safety would be helpful.

Many others much brighter than I have helped me understand the concepts and history of “defunding the police”, and what it really means. As a phrase it does not have a lot of support, and it is not right to cast all police officers as a problem. But what does this have to do with meditation? From meditating for over a decade, the greatest benefit I have discovered is a major reduction in the impulse to respond instinctively and aggressively to the suggestions of others. This manifests as an open-minded approach to life, and problem solving. It’s amazing how focusing on the need to refrain from thought in meditation translates to an ability to refrain from judgement of the words of others, to an ability to refrain from reacting to the political arguments of others. If we lived in a world where more people did this, we might get more effective solutions.

Does contemplation complicate or simplify?

An essential feature of a meditative practice is coming together with a small group to meditate, and often converse. In Buddhism, this is referenced in the concept of Sangha, which I broadly understand as a collection of humans with greater wisdom than oneself (though I could be wrong). In Christianity, many strands advocate meditating in a small group on a regular basis, and Gospels are clear that Christ will show up when we gather in his name.

I am blessed to meditate with a group of wise men from my parish, and after meditating and checking in, we discuss a text in detail, bringing our experiences as gifts to one another, and seeking guidance on issues in our lives. I feel so lucky to be present, and provided by them.

In a recent meeting, while discussing Thomas Merton’s, New Seeds of Contemplation, a man brought up a statement that has been drilling through my brain since, “Contemplation does not simplify, or complicate, it integrates.” And this has been rocking my world ever since.

When we sit down to meditate, we flip off all worldly or created channels, be they trivial or important. And we try to open our minds and ears and be aware of what arises during that time. If what we understand to be God speaks to us, so be it.

It is interesting to me because while the directions are simple, the outcomes can be so complicating. And it can be so hard! But as my friend pointed out, proper analysis of meditative practice often follow non-dualistic pathways. Meditating does not simplify your life, or complicate your life, but it integrates your life. Your attention will be pulled towards issues you wanted to ignore, complicating matters. Previously perceived problems can be melted away, simplifying our perspective.

If you are wishing to see greater integration in your life, or if you do not feel like the effects of meditation are spilling into places you would like, consider two remedies. The first is to engage in Centering Prayer, but embrace it with a commitment to refrain from judging. Accept non-dualism as a Christian mindset. Secondly, attempt to have your meditative practice “spread like weeds”, in the words of a teacher of mine, Master Sang Kim. He reminds us that mint is a weed, raspberries are weeds, and many good things spread in this fashion. If we attempt to practice our meditation while doing the dishes, or going for a run, or brushing our teeth, this mindset can spread throughout the day and help us integrate our lives.

What David Brooks and James Martin really want

David Brooks, one of the more enigmatic and frustrating opinion columnists for the New York Times, recently penned a piece documenting America’s lack of civility, and begging the questions of what is causing us to treat each other so awfully, and what can heal our national ailment. Predictably, the comments section focused squarely on the former, with the internet, Republicans, and Donald Trump headlining the list of reasons.

James Martin, a Jesuit and prolific author of books on Catholicism, wrote another piece for the Times lamenting attempts to shame and embarrass the unvaccinated who have died from COVID, and schadenfreude more broadly. This article did not permit comments, but one can still easily find websites documenting the unnecessary deaths of anti-vaccine individuals.

Neither is getting what they wish, as moralism is a poor approach to modifying behavior. But the issue they are really leaning towards is that many people lack mellow hearts, but being a complete Christian demands that we cultivate and nurture a mellow heart.

Ronald Rolheiser alludes to this in his incredible text, The Holy Longing, which is as fine a place as one could start in a mission to be a better person or a more Christian person. While I believe he does a great job identifying what a mellow heart is, and why it is important to a Christian life, Christianity has largely failed to provide people training and practice to mellow their own, actual heart. In contrast, Buddhism has an amazing set of meditative practices designed to help us become more loving, compassionate, joyful, and even-keeled. All of these virtues are Christian, and will help us address both Brooks’ and Martin’s concerns.

The Four Immeasurables are part of Buddhist practice, and refer both to the virtues themselves and the meditations to develop them. My favorite book on the matter, and perhaps favorite book of all time, is Mind at Ease, by Traleg Kyagban Rinpoche. He walks the reader through many meditations, but the meat is really the four immeasurables, which are love, compassion, joy, and equilibrity. The meditations are of similar structure: one tries to cultivate the virtue in question by exercising it: build your joy by feeling joy.

As an example, here is a meditation in this tradition for building compassion, a virtue we can all agree is in sore need in your neighborhood, and worldwide:

Set aside 20 minutes.  Adopt a posture which is relaxed, but alert.  Take a few moments to breath deeply, and clear the mind, placing your attention in the space behind your forehead. 

Think of a person you are close to, and feel compassion for her or him.  Feel that person in need of consolation, and this consolation being delivered by God in the perfect way.  Imagine that person finding total peace and harmony from this compassion.  Relax with this person in his or her resolved state. After about 5 minutes, return the mind to equanimity.

Next, think of a person you have not seen in a long time, you recently met, or to whom you have neutral feelings.  Even if you do not know what troubles this person, imagine them receiving compassion from God.  Imagine all their sense of troubles evaporating and eliminated, and this person feeling loved and consoled despite these difficulties.  Again, peacefully sink into this compassion, and experience it.  After about 5 minutes, return the mind to equanimity.

Then, consider a person who has given you difficulty.  Imagine them receiving compassion from God.  Imagine all their difficulties being met by God, and melting away. See this person finding true and wholesome compassion.  Again, peacefully dwell in this compassion, and experience it.  After about 5 minutes, return the mind to equanimity.

Last, thank God for this opportunity.  Ask that God may spread compassion to all humans, and meet their emotional, physical, and spiritual needs.  Ask that God may provide you with peace and a compassionate heart for the remainder of the day. 

Some men I have conducted this meditation with have mentioned that after they think of a person, and imagine that person feeling compassion, their attention moves on to other people and they sense compassion there. That’s okay! Just try to return it to the person you initially considered.

I am not a perfect person, and I have done a lot of ill in my life. But engaging in this practice has helped me build a compassionate heart, and mellowed it. And it has helped me address the complaints of Brooks and Martin. May it offer you a solution!

Learn to be an Effective Birth Partner

Thankfully, my wife and I have recently welcomed our second daughter into this world. She means the world to us and we are overjoyed every day we are able to hold her, love her, and watch her grow. When we were expecting our first, I was terrified about my performance… in the delivery room, as a birth partner. There is a reason I teach physics and not biology, and I don’t handle blood in movies or real life particularly well.

But, I really wanted to be present at the birth of my child, and believed if I passed out, I would be letting my wife down. Further, it could undermine the wonder of our child coming along. So, my tendency to fix problems is to read books about them, and I suggest two books to help men support their female partners in childbirth: Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth by Ina May Gaskin, and The Birth Partner, by Penny Simkin. And, most importantly, read any damn book your partner wants you to read, because she is bearing the baby.

The reason I like these two books is they provide a wide array of possible ways to support your partner, and possessing a broad toolkit to assist others is what life is all about. Ina May Gaskin is America’s midwife, and her text contains dozens of birth stories which helped me understand the diversity of childbirthing experiences people have. It is not too technical, but my familiarity with the whole process increased as a result.

The Birth Partner is great because it walked me through all the stages of childbirth, and when my wife was experiencing contractions, I knew what was going on, had some ideas about what she might want, and I had expectations for what came next. Absent this, I would have been a ball of anxiety and worry, which no one needs in the delivery room. They say familiarity breeds contempt, and that just doesn’t apply in these circumstances. The best suggestion from this book was to sing to my daughters when they were in the womb, because babies can be soothed by those songs after they are born. Being able to calm a newborn is an incredible power.

Ultimately, no one really cares about what fathers contribute in the delivery room, you just do not want to mess it up. So if your partner is expecting, pick up these two texts and get learning! She is certainly doing her part, you should as well.

Trying to Parent like Bluey’s Dad

My daughter’s pediatrician has a television streaming non-stop in the waiting room, which puts me off a bit. But, I have been blessed with its introduction of Bluey into my life. Boy, this show is awesome for dads like me, seeking to be involved parents but lacking in great role models for modern fatherhood

Bluey is an Australian heeler dog (which I am sure is an incredibly popular breed right now), and on her show (yes, it’s a girl, which surprises many) she is found playing imaginatively with her family. Not baseball, or soccer, or just dolls, but imaginative games with multiple layers, morals, lessons, and directions. For a person as literal as I am, understanding the origins and benefits of this has been a real challenge, but is paying off.

Bluey’s dad, Bandit, is considered the star of the show by most dads, because he is the dad. And he is an awesome father figure: playing games all the time, doing laundry, changing nappies, going grocery shopping, and roughhousing. I was jealous of him, until I accepted he is a dog, a cartoon, and fictional. He carries a message of reverent masculinity. He is undoubtedly loving to his wife and children, but also rough, strong, patient, and creative. There is a sense he is growing into himself as a parent and person, which is admirable. I have been trying to incorporate his techniques into my parenting, with success. And here are a few comments on how I currently parent like Bandit:

-Make like it’s an improv show, and don’t say no. When my daughter calls me a “baby daddy”, the concept is that I am dressed as and capable like a baby, but also a dad. Weird, but I can do it for a little while.

-Bring kids on everything. We got an oil change last Saturday. My daughter loved watching the people working on cars, and is fascinated by the staircase into the dark basement. We’ll probably build an oil change shop with legos this week.

-If a task is difficult, try reframing it into something fantastical and ridiculous. Putting on snowpants became “giant worm attack”. Doesn’t make any sense, because worms are not shaped like tubes, but it got her snowpants on.

I am very curious to see how this plays out as my daughter ages, and whether her imaginative side remains. I am curious whether my ability to play imaginatively will develop as well, but hopeful that it will. I’ll probably have to watch more Bluey.

Book Review: The Dead March

The past 15 years has been a fascinating time to be an American and reflect on what “American Exceptionalism” really means. Frankly, I have no idea, but reading Peter Guardino’s, The Dead March: A History of the Mexican American War has provided me a wealth of understanding about American power and history during an often overlooked period of time, the 1840’s.

One of my favorite trilogies is the Liberation Trilogy by Rick Atkinson, which chronicles the United States ground forces liberation of North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and Western Europe in World War II. I appreciate not just their incredible style and depth, but the inclusion of the failures of Allied soldiers, their unfamiliarity with the causes of the war, and documentation of the racism which existed within American culture. It is a full picture. Despite these warts, we can understand World War II in Europe very clearly as Allied forces using their might and military to liberate lands from an oppressive, horrible, aggressive regime. The best of American values were exported to places which desired them.

As for the Mexican American War, Guardino left me believing the exact opposite. Americans exported the absolute worst of American traditions such as racism, imperialism, and conquest to people who were not welcoming these values. The premises of the war were ridiculous, and its execution was conducted by imperialist, racist, and xenophobic troops. Guardino masterfully provides a balanced perspective on this war, explaining events from the perspectives of Mexican and American soldiers and civilians.

The book’s greatest strength lies in the details of life in the age that he provides, underscoring just how different and difficult life in 19th century Mexico was. For instance, the major advantage the American military had was light artillery which could be easily maneuvered, albeit with draft animals. But it was these draft animals which fascinated me. Donkeys, horses and mules needed to be trained for military service, otherwise they would run off, carrying supplies. This training essentially involved blasting lots and lots of cannon in the vicinity of the animals, so they would get used to these explosions. This was very expensive, so the Americans were able to use “professional” draft animals, while the Mexican army could not afford this.

History is best when it is complete. I enjoyed this text because it offered a complete picture of an era I was unfamiliar with, and highly recommend it.

Norms for a Meditation Group

Many people find meditating independently difficult, but are successful when they do so in a small group. And the notion of collective meditation has roots in many spiritual and secular traditions. I have been fortunate to attend many groups, and lead two.

Most meetings are successful, because they are collections of people who want to slow down their thinking, listen deeply, learn and grow. But unfortunately, not everyone is in that same frame of mind, all the time. A meditation group I once led fell apart after my departure, largely because of the presence of a man who frequently emailed diatribes on social and science issues which expressed disdain for those who disagreed with him. I can only imagine what his contributions were during the discussion period.

After that experience, setting up a new group in a new parish, I knew norms were essential for a productive, if not always positive, experience for everyone. My teacher training and experience facilitating discussions with students informed this process, as high school students are impressive in their need for guard rails in discussion. And since my current group has norms, we have had valuable contributions from a committed group of men diverse in age, family structure, and meditative experience.

The agenda is as follows:

-Open with prayer: The Our Father
-Meditation, guided or silent, led by group facilitator
-Short break ~4 minutes
-Share-outs: Everyone should share their name at a minimum, and if they wish, what has been working on them spiritually, emotionally, professionally, or personally over the last week.
-Discussion of book chapter or reading.
-Closing prayer: The Hail Mary

Generally, the meeting is 90 minutes. Each component has its own norms, important for very specific reasons.

-For the opening, it is expected that people are in the room when the meeting begins. Zoom meetings have alleviated this, but meditation is difficult when unexpected disturbances are occurring in the physical space.

-During the meditation, is is expected that everyone does the same form/style of meditation. This provides a more coordinated environment to pray.

-Share-outs should not be responded to or followed by clarifying questions. Every person should have the opportunity to share without judgement, evaluation, or feedback, but simply share to share. The world we live in is full of reaction, and the person sharing can access that in a multitude of ways. Those listening will benefit from learning to listen without reacting, but can reach out to others after the meeting if they so wish.

-The discussion of a spiritual text has the most norms, including, but not limited to: 1.) Take space, make space. If everyone generally knows how you feel about things, try to adopt a posture of listening, and if you tend not to share, please try to have your voice heard.
2.) We live on spiritual time, not social or political time. If you want a politically charged discussion of today’s politics, you can access that in many other places. That said, if a particular politically charged issue is front and center in your personal daily life, please feel free to discuss this.
3.) Listen to understand, not to react.

People generally get the idea when these norms are stated, and might initially tiptoe around the second one. The norm does not mean no political issue can be discussed, but this is not a political complaint-fest. However, if your family are undocumented immigrants, your concerns over how immigrants are portrayed by politicians might be of very personal import, and is valuable for others to hear.

Most importantly for the facilitator is the following: Create a time convenient for most, stick to it, and email people about 3 days beforehand with a reminder. Once it becomes a habit in peoples’ lives, it becomes much easier. There is no time that is perfect for everyone, but just having it will assist in people attending.

Serendipitous Reverent Masculinity

Last week I utterly failed the “Ted Lasso Test”. In a famous scene from the show, Ted implores a villain to be curious, not judgmental as he walks through life. My car was getting worked on, and I needed a haircut. I was in a blue collar part of town, and I walked to a barber shop. Upon entering, they informed me that I needed an appointment. “Ridiculous!” I internally pronounced, walking to the next establishment. I walked in, seeing one patron sitting, three barbers at work, and three men getting their haircut.

Again, I was told I should have an appointment, but one barber, who seemed to be running the show, told me he thought he had a cancellation and could get me in, suggesting I take a seat. “Who are these people?” I thought. “It’s 10:30 on a Friday morning, why can’t I get a haircut?” I set to do some work, and waited.

On the walls were mock guns, and some model motorcycles were sitting on shelves. And there was a lot of conversation, with no television or radio. The crowd was very diverse, with black, white, Arab, and Latino patrons and barbers. As I sat, and listened, I realized why this particular barber shop was so damn popular.

One man shared a story about how his son was bullied at school, which was the impetus for both of them training in Jiu-Jitsu. His son ultimately had a confrontation which led to him first refraining from using his skills, then employing them such that he never got bullied again. Another man brought in food to share with other patrons, with detailed instructions on reheating. And finally, while the barber was cutting my hair, he shared stories about his family’s pregnancy loss, which tore at my heart. This was more than a barbershop, it was therapy.

There were no photos of scantily clad women on the wall, no racial slurs, no shit talking. This was positive, or reverent masculinity, at its finest. Men wanting to be good and look good. Men wanting to be men, not boys. I loved it, and will be back. More importantly, the haircut looked great. Most importantly, I learned my lesson, and will try to be curious, not judgmental, wherever I go.

Focus and Attention

Occasionally I hear about people new to meditating, especially for the first time, who complain about the difficulty, pain, or frustration with focusing on their breath. Sometimes this is coupled with a complaint of headaches. There are two major reasons for this, which need clearing up.

First, focus is active, focus demands effort. And in meditation we are not looking to exert effort. Broadly, in life, it is worth focusing on our big issues, and on resolving problems. But in meditation we try to bring attention to our anchor, rather than focus on it.

Second, meditation is frankly, not trivial or easy, though very simple. We live in an age where our attention has become a commodity that companies crave and fight for. So bringing your attention to something without a marketing budget is difficult. But what is simple is making the time, setting the timer, and actually sitting down to do it.

« Older posts

© 2024 Andrew Lapetina

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑